March
18,
2004
Press
Release
The
Union
Home
Minister,
L.K.
Advani,
on
the
eve
of
his
`Bharat
Uday
Yatra'
stated
that
during
the
tenure
of
the
NDA
government,
he
has
learnt
a
lot
about
the
federal
structure
and
federal
relations.
For
him,
however,
what
their
government
did
in
Bihar
was
`passe'.
And,
the
extent
to
which
the
NDA
government
worked
in
completely
destroying
the
State
finance
--
the
essential
aspect
of
cooperative
federalism
--
is
a
subject
Advani
would
rather
try
to
keep
in
the
background.
Therefore,
we
from
the
Communist
Party
of
India
(Marxist),
thought
it
necessary
to
recall
this
in
the
seventh
of
our
series
--
"Lies,
damned
lies
and
statistics"
--
to
nail
down
the
falsehood
of
the
`Shining
India'
campaign.
*****
Is
India
Really
Shining?
Lies,
Damned
Lies
and
Statistics
Fiscal
Federalism
Undermined
under
NDA
·
Prime
Minister
Vajpayee
has
often
claimed
that
‘cooperative
federalism’
has
been
the
cornerstone
of
governance
under
the
NDA.
The
reality,
however,
has
been
much
removed
from
this
claim.
The
tenure
of
the
NDA
government
has
witnessed
unprecedented
fiscal
crises
faced
by
almost
all
the
State
governments
in
the
country.
The
fact
that
so
many
State
governments
have
simultaneously
found
themselves
in
a
financial
mess
during
the
past
six
years
points
to
the
fact
that
the
crises
have
more
to
do
with
the
policies
of
the
Central
government
than
the
fiscal
profligacy
of
particular
State
governments.
·
The
fiscal
crises
faced
by
the
State
governments
have
resulted
from
the
undermining
of
fiscal
federalism
under
the
NDA
regime
in
two
significant
ways.
Firstly,
by
raising
the
interest
rate
charged
on
the
outstanding
liabilities
of
the
States,
the
interest
payment
burden
of
the
States
has
been
increased
substantially.
Secondly,
in
order
to
reduce
its
own
fiscal
deficit
arising
out
of
the
tax
concessions
it
has
made
to
the
rich,
the
Centre
has
passed
on
its
burden
to
the
State
governments
by
reducing
the
share
of
transfers
to
the
States.
This
is
not
only
violative
of
the
spirit
of
federalism,
but
strikes
at
the
root
of
our
democratic
set
up,
wherein
the
State
governments
have
to
bear
the
brunt
of
the
political
attacks
against
the
fiscal
crisis
and
the
lack
of
resources
for
development,
while
the
role
of
the
Central
government
in
precipitating
the
crisis
seldom
coming
under
scrutiny.
·
The
Central
taxes
to
GDP
ratio,
both
in
terms
of
gross
tax
revenue
and
net
tax
revenue
as
a
percent
of
GDP
at
market
prices
had
declined
from
9.14%
and
6.28%
in
1997-98
to
8.10%
and
5.78%
in
2001-02
respectively.
The
States’
share
in
the
Central
tax
revenue
as
a
percent
of
GDP
also
declined
from
2.86%
to
2.29%
during
this
period.
Tax-GDP
(at
market
prices)
Ratios
of
the
Centre
Government
|
|
|
|||
|
Year |
Gross
Tax
Revenue
(%
of
GDP) |
States'
Share
(%
of
GDP) |
Net
Tax
Revenue (%
of
GDP) |
|
|
1997-98 |
9.14 |
2.86 |
6.28 |
|
|
2001-02 |
8.10 |
2.29 |
5.78 |
|
Source:
Union
Finance
Accounts
of
relevant
years.
Total
Transfer
of
Resources
from
Centre
to
States
|
Year |
Total
Transfers
(%
of
GDP) |
|
1997-98 |
4.81 |
|
1998-99 |
3.69 |
|
1999-2000 |
3.74 |
|
2000-01 |
4.38 |
|
2001-02 |
4.61 |
|
2002-03(R) |
4.09 |
Source:
Union
Finance
Accounts
of
relevant
years.
·
The
total
outstanding
liabilities
(debt)
of
all
the
States
taken
together
as
a
percentage
of
GDP
at
market
prices
has
continuously
gone
up
since
1997-98
and
reached
as
high
as
almost
30%
of
GDP
in
the
year
2002-03
from
about
22%
in
1997-98.
Total
Outstanding
Liabilities
of
All
States
(%
of
GDP
at
market
prices)
|
States |
1997-98 |
1998-99 |
1999-2000 |
2000-01 |
2001-02 |
2002-03 |
|
Debt
as
%
of
GDP |
21.73 |
23.01 |
24.96 |
27.44 |
29.15 |
29.53 |
Source:
Finance
Accounts
of
the
States.
·
The
effective
interest
rate
that
the
States
had
to
pay
on
their
liabilities
had
also
gone
up
from
8.96%
in
1992-93
to
between
10.5
-
11%
on
an
average
for
the
years
1998-99
to
2002-03.
The
fact
that
the
States
were
being
made
to
pay
higher
interest
rates
on
their
liabilities
implies
that
the
RBI
and
the
Central
government
wanted
them
to
do
so.
Effective
Interest
Rate
Paid
by
State
Governments
on
their
Outstanding
Liabilities
|
Year |
1992-93 |
1998-99 |
1999-00 |
2000-01 |
2001-02 |
2002-03 |
|
Effective
Interest
Rate |
8.96 |
10.94 |
11.14 |
10.53 |
10.52 |
10.61 |
Source:
Finance
Accounts
of
the
States.
·
As
a
result
of
the
hike
in
the
interest
rates,
the
interest
payments
by
the
States
has
increased
at
a
much
faster
rate
during
the
NDA
rule,
imposing
a
heavy
burden
on
their
exchequer.
Source:
Finance
Accounts
of
the
States
Note:
The
figure
for
2002-2003
is
a
revised
estimate
·
The
combined
revenue
deficit
(i.e.
the
difference
between
total
revenue
expenditure
and
total
revenue
receipts
of
all
the
States
taken
together)
as
a
percent
of
Gross
Domestic
Product
(GDP)
has
increased
significantly
during
the
period
1997-98
to
2001-02.
In
2001-02
the
total
revenue
deficit
of
all
States
as
a
percent
of
GDP
was
nearly
four
times
more
than
what
it
was
in
1997-98.
This
was
a
direct
outcome
of
the
undermining
of
fiscal
federalism
by
the
NDA
government.
Revenue
Deficit
of
All
States
(%
of
GDP)
|
Year |
Revenue
Deficit
as
a
%
of
GDP |
|
1997-98 |
1.21 |
|
1998-99 |
3.08 |
|
1999-2000 |
2.71 |
|
2000-01 |
3.18 |
|
2001-02 |
4.39 |
Source: Finance Accounts of the States