Amended version of the paper presented at the IT 2000 Kerala International Seminar, “Crafting a Knowledge Society in the 21st Century”, 23-25 November at Technopark, Trivandrum
Economy
In
the
Knowledge
Society
Sitaram
Yechury
Extending
one
of
Karl
Marx's
famous
and
oft
quoted
out
of
context
statement
that
"the
hand
mill
gives
you
society
with
the
feudal
lord
and
the
steam
mill
gives
you
society
with
the
industrial
capitalist",
one
commentator,
noting
the
epochal
shifts
under
globalisation
added
that
"the
microchip
gives
you
society
with
the
global
capitalist".[i]
Undoubtedly,
the
revolutionary
advances
in
information
technology
have
transformed
the
world.
But,
it
would
be
erroneous,
to
conclude
that
these
technologies
are
in
any
way
creating
a
situation
(like
the
transition
from
the
hand
mill
to
the
steam
mill)
that
would
provide
any
reprieve
from
the
intensifying
degree
of
exploitation
under
capitalism.
These
advances,
by
themselves,
are
the
result
of
the
internal
dynamics
of
the
capitalist
system.
By
saying
so,
one
does
not
in
any
way
seek
to
undermine
the
scientific
advances
in
this
field
as
a
mere
corollary
of
capitalist
development.
Neither
does
one
seek
to
negate
the
possibilities
that
these
advances
open
up
for
the
democratic
forces
to
advance
their
struggles.
For,
after
all,
knowledge
and
information
do
have
their
liberation
potential.
However,
the
concrete
manifestation
of
these
possibilities
in
any
given
actuality,
depends
on
the
struggle
between
contending
forces
at
the
ground
level.
In
the
very
process
of
development,
capitalism
creates
the
internationalisation
and
concentration
of
Capital
on
vast
scales.
These
developments,
in
turn,
require
speedier
communication
and
massive
levels
of
information
in
order
to
allow
Capital
to
conduct
its
global
operations.
The
development
of
capitalism
to
this
stage
of
a
highly
concentrated
internationalisation
of
Capital
which
is
globally
mobile
required
a
highly
developed
information
and
communication
network.
There
is
thus
a
dialectical
linkage
between
the
development
of
capitalism
and
the
present
day
scientific
advances
of
the
IT
revolution.
The
present
day
rapid
strides
in
the
information,
communication
and
entertainment
(ICE)
technology
have
created
an
enormously
large
global
industry.
The
convergence
of
these
technologies,
as
someone
commented,
is
more
"fiscal
than
digital".[ii]
The
present
day
emergence
of
giant
corporations
in
the
entertainment
and
information
industries
reminds
us
of
what
Karl
Marx
had
said
nearly
150
years
ago:
"Production
not
only
provides
the
material
to
satisfy
a
need,
but
it
also
provides
the
need
for
the
material.
When
consumption
emerges
from
its
original
primitive
crudeness
and
immediacy
--
and
its
remaining
in
that
state
would
be
due
to
the
fact
that
production
was
still
primitively
crude
--
then
it
is
itself
a
desire
brought
about
by
the
object.
The
need
felt
for
the
object
is
induced
by
the
perception
of
the
object.
An
object
d'art
creates
a
public
that
has
artistic
taste
and
is
able
to
enjoy
beauty
--
and
the
same
can
be
said
of
any
other
product.
Production
accordingly
produces
not
only
an
object
for
the
subject,
but
also
a
subject
for
the
object."
[iii]
The
entire
raison
d'être
of
the
advertisement
industry
today
has
not
only
been
anticipated
long
long
back,
but
predicted
as
a
consequence
of
the
internal
dynamics
of
capitalist
development.
II
The
present
day
information
technology
revolution,
apart
from
its
impact
on
vast
areas
of
human
activity,
has
three
aspects
that
we
wish
to
take
up
here.
The
first
is
a
narrow
one
as
an
industry.
The
second,
its
impact
on
society
in
terms
of
social
and
economic
inequalities;
and
finally
its
impact
on
the
quality
of
life.
It
will
be
useful
to
recollect
at
the
outset,
the
hopes
and
possibilities
raised
by
the
rapid
technological
advances
in
this
sector
for
overall
economic
growth.
Gordon
Moores's
prediction,
which
has
virtually
become
a
law
in
this
field,
has
seen
the
number
of
transistors
on
a
microchip
increasing
from
2300
on
a
4004
in
1971
to
26
million
on
a
Pentium
III.
In
terms
of
costs,
one
MHz
computing
power
declined
from
$760
to
¢17
cents
during
this
period
of
three
decades
from
1970.
Similarly,
the
cost
of
storing
one
mega
bit
of
information
declined
from
$5257
to
mere
17
cents.
The
cost
of
transmitting
a
trillion
bits
of
information
declined
from
$150,000
to
12
cents.[iv]
These
advances
in
microprocessor
technology
have
a
vast
indirect
impact.
New
advances
from
microwaves
to
mobile
telephones
have
come
into
being
as
a
result.
These
technologies
have
the
potential
to
transform
the
industrial
base
through
numerous
design
and
manufacturing
possibilities.
Further,
in
the
services
sector,
ranging
from
banking
and
insurance
to
entertainment
and
information,
these
technologies
have
opened
up
hitherto
unknown
vistas
of
development.
The
immediate
impact
of
these
developments
on
India
has
been
estimated
by
various
agencies.
In
the
last
six
months
alone,
software
exports
from
India
increased
by
63
per
cent
to
reach
$
2.4
billion
or
12.5
per
cent
of
the
total
exports.[v]
In
terms
of
FDI,
in
the
first
six
months
of
this
year,
the
computer
software
sector
attracted
as
much
as
Rs.
3907.45
crores.
Compare
this
to
Rs
445.43
crores
in
automobile
sector
and
Rs
202.01
crore
in
oil
refinery.
The
telecom
sector
which
has
directly
benefits
from
the
IT
advances
has
attracted
Rs.
1658.13
crores.[vi]
Given
this,
large
hopes
have
been
generated
in
India.
IT
sector
is
being
projected
as
the
vehicle
of
India's
entry
into
the
advanced
world.
NASSCOM
expects
that
by
2008
the
overall
turnover
of
IT
enabled
service
opportunities
for
India
would
be
to
the
tune
of
$140
billion.
The
projections
for
export
earnings
are
up
from
$4
billion
in
1999-2000
to
$50
billion
in
2008.
The
size
of
the
industry
during
this
period
is
expected
to
increase
from
$3.3
billion
in
1998
to
$87
billion,
an
astounding
compounding
annual
growth
of
40
per
cent.
Its
share
in
the
GDP
is
expected
to
grow
to
7.5
per
cent
from
the
present
less
than
2
per
cent
and
in
terms
of
exports,
its
share
is
expected
to
grow
to
30
per
cent.
In
1997-98
the
IT
sector
employed
1.8
lakhs
of
people.
This
is
expected
to
grow
to
2.2
million
i.e.
more
than
the
growth
in
public
and
private
sector
employment
between
1990-98.
The
total
number
of
people
directly
and
indirectly
employed
is
estimated
o
be
7
million
by
2008.[vii]
Is
this
all
hype,
or,
can
this
be
translated
into
reality?
In
order
to
answer
this
question,
it
is
necessary
to
understand
the
constraints
within
which
this
industry
is
operating
in
India.
Two-thirds
of
the
domestic
IT
industry
is
accounted
for
by
hardware
and
packed
software
that
comes
in
from
abroad.
Only
8.9
per
cent
of
the
software
services
originate
domestically.[viii]
The
growth
potential
of
this
sector
and
its
impact
on
the
overall
economic
development
must
be
tempered
with
the
fact
that
this
sector
has
a
very
high
and
growing
import
intensity.
This
reality
must
also
be
seen
in
the
background
of
the
unbridled
liberalisation
process
going
on
in
the
country.
The
import
liberalisation
in
this
sector
has
virtually
led
to
a
situation
where
domestic
producers
are
unable
to
face
the
competition.
Unless
this
trend
is
reversed,
India
may
well
produce
only
domestic
sales
agents
for
international
firms.
Hence,
India's
hopes
for
channelising
the
potential
of
this
sector
to
change
the
overall
Indian
economy
rests
mainly
on
the
export
of
software
services.
Here
again
out
of
the
1250
firms
currently
existing
in
the
country,
only
37
export
software
services
of
a
value
greater
than
Rs.
100
crores
annually.[ix]
In
the
sphere
of
computer
hardware
there
is
a
global
monopoly
in
the
hands
of
a
few
firms
like
Intel,
Motorola,
AMD
etc.
The
process
of
assembling
in
India
contributes
very
little
to
the
value
added
domestically.
It
is
estimated
that
of
the
global
information
technology
market
of
$750
billion,
the
third
world
contributes
only
27
per
cent.
What
is
worse
is
that
less
than
5
per
cent
of
the
world's
population
participates
in
the
internet,
which
currently
involves
over
330
million
users.[x]
Hence,
given
the
highly
unequal
and
monopolised
ownership
and
control
of
this
technology
globally,
the
hype
of
the
IT
sector,
liberating
India
from
economic
backwardness
must
be
considered
with
more
than
a
pinch
of
salt.
Major
problems
for
India
lie
elsewhere
i.e.
in
the
spheres
of
socio-economic
infrastructure.
In
1998-99,
India
had
a
ratio
of
personal
computers
per
population
of
3
per
thousand
and
telephone
access
of
22
per
thousand.
Worldwide
these
figures
are
60
per
thousand
and
125
per
thousand.
According
to
the
Govt.
of
India
projections
by
2008,
these
will
grow
only
20
per
thousand
and
100
per
thousand
respectively.[xi]
Further,
the
advances
that
India
had
made
in
this
sector
is
based
on
the
education
system
that
produced
the
necessary
intellectual
manpower.
But
it
is
precisely
this
sector
that
is
coming
in
for
heavy
erosion
in
the
name
of
"doing
away
with
subsidies".
Therefore
the
future
potential
of
India's
capacity
to
utilise
the
IT
revolution
is
being
seriously
undermined
by
the
present
policies.
It
must
be
noted
that
the
IT
industry
in
India
would
not
have
taken
off
like
it
has
today
if
education,
particularly
technical
education,
had
been
the
privilege
of
the
only
the
rich.
Thus,
unless
the
basic
economy
is
addressed,
the
information
technology
advances
may
well
end
up
in
expanding
inequalities
rather
than
bridging
them.
The
e-brick
and
e-mortar
economy
cannot
replace
the
brick
and
mortar
real
economy
which
remains
the
basic
driving
force
behind
economic
development.
IT
through
e-commerce
can
at
best
cut
down
trading
costs.
The
economic
value
still
remains
in
the
strength
of
the
basic
economy.
There
is
a
danger
that
with
all
this
hype
of
IT,
the
focus
of
attention
may
well
be
diverted
away
from
tackling
India's
industrial
slow
down.
Thus,
in
terms
of
the
impact
on
the
quality
of
life,
while
at
the
margin
IT
does
enhance
the
accessibility
of
information
and
expands
the
possibiliteis
before
human
beings,
the
catchment
areas
of
the
population
that
can
benefit
from
this
is
directly
dependent
upon
the
strength
of
the
basic
economy.
If
this
does
not
improve,
then
the
IT
revolution
may
well
end
exacerbating
global
and
domestic
inequalities.
No
less
than
Bill
Gates
had
to
say
"We
are
all
created
equal
in
the
virtual
world"
but
"virtual
equality",
he
states
"is
far
easier
to
achieve
than
real
world
equality".[xii]
In
the
world
of
information
highway
tens
of
millions
of
poorer
individuals
in
the
United
States,
not
to
mention
the
great
majority
of
the
population
in
the
world
economy
will
simply
be
left
behind.
In
the
Indian
context,
it
should
be
noted
that
according
to
the
published
report
on
basic
education
in
India,
at
the
time
of
the
1991
census
and
the
National
Family
Health
Service
1992,
half
the
country's
population
(61
per
cent
of
women
and
36
per
cent
of
men
aged
7
and
above)
is
unable
to
read
and
write.
Less
than
30
per
cent
of
all
adults
had
completed
8
years
of
schooling,
one-third
of
all
children
aged
6
to
14
years
(about
23
million
boys
and
36
million
girls)
were
out
of
school.[xiii]
This,
in
itself,
in
a
telling
manner
demonstrates
India's
capabilities
of
utilising
the
IT
revolution
for
its
overall
economic
development.
We
may
well
end
up
in
a
situation
of
widening
the
social
divide
between
the
educated
info-rich
and
the
under-educated
info-poor.
The
biggest
of
myths
is
generated
by
seeking
to
replace
human
teaching
by
IT.
Our
human
neurons
processes
as
much
as
11
million
bytes
per
second.
The
present
technology
does
not
permit
us
to
remotely
reach
this
speed.
IT
provides
information
divested
from
its
richness.
The
classroom
and
the
teacher
are
central
to
teaching
and
can
at
best
be
complemented
by
IT
and
by
no
means
substituted.
IT
has
also
provided
opportunities
for
e-governance.
Certain
initiatives
in
the
country
like
the
disaster
management
project
in
Maharashtra
or
the
mandal
revenue
officers
network
in
Andhra
Pradesh
or
the
village
level
project
"Wired
Village"
being
implemented
in
Waranagar
in
Sangli
and
Kohlapur
districts
in
Maharashtra
are
all
efforts
for
providing
greater
transparency
and
accountability
to
governance
apart
from
providing
information
to
the
people
on
various
administrative
matters.
Laudable
as
they
are,
constraints
at
utilising
these
for
India
as
a
whole
must
be
underlined.
For
instance,
the
70
villages
cluster
in
the
Waranna
project
costs
$
6000.
If
this
were
to
be
considered
for
all
the
5,50,000
villages
in
India,
then
it
would
cost
$4.7
billion
or
12.5
per
cent
of
the
GDP
in
1998-99.
Consider
this
in
the
background
of
the
fact
that
India
has
never
spent
the
universally
accepted
6
per
cent
of
the
GDP
on
education.
As
far
as
India
is
concerned,
there
is
an
apparent
dilemma.
Not
investing
in
IT
implies
forgoing
the
possibilities
for
economic
development.
However,
excessive
emphasis
on
IT
means
the
danger
of
diverting
resources
away
from
the
basic
economy
which
is
the
very
foundation
for
the
IT
to
take
off.
While
judicious
balance
is
required
in
this
direction,
it
must
be
emphasised
that
the
present
hype
over
IT
neglecting
the
basic
economy
can
only
prove
disastrous
for
India.
Kerala,
however
is
uniquely
placed
to
take
advantage
of
the
IT.
Its
high
levels
of
literacy
and
the
social
quality
of
life
place
it
in
a
position
to
take
full
advantage
of
the
IT
revolution.
With
the
paucity
of
mineral
and
other
resources
required
for
heavy
industry,
Kerala
should
attach
a
high
priority
to
take
up
the
IT
advances
in
a
big
way
for
the
state's
development.
In
the
spheres
of
e-governance
Kerala
is
once
again,
best
equipped
to
provide
the
people
with
access
to
information
on
developmental
programmes
with
transparency
and
accountability
of
its
implementation
through
the
People's
Plan.
Kerala,
in
this
context
rightly
seeks
to
improve
the
livelihood
and
quality
of
life
of
its
people
through
the
IT
revolution.
Finally, we can only conclude by asserting that the economy in the knowledge society, however radically impacted by IT, has to develop by strengthening the real brick and mortar fundamentals and cannot afford to be hijacked into the virtual reality of e-brick and e-mortar. While utilising fully the potentialities and possibilities unleashed by IT revolution, proper attention must be paid to the limitations and constraints noted above. Unfortunately, the mindless and reckless policies of liberalisation currently pursued in India by the Vajpayee government, prevent the tapping of the full benefits of IT. These policies are in fact, axing the tree on which we are sitting.
[i] A. Sivanandan, “Globalisation and Epochal Shifts: An Exchange”, Monthly Review 48, No. 9:20
[ii] For instance, consider the fact that three of the world’s far largest media giants now own the three largest global book publishers. Such convergence is dramatically illustrated in the film-based industries. Disney or Time Warner, when they produce a film can simultaneously guarantee the showings on pay television channels and networks, produce and sell audio sound tracks, produce related amusement park rides, CD-ROMs, books, comics and related material. Consider that Disney’s Hunchback of Notre Dam raked a disappointing $200 billion in the global box office. Yet according to Adweek magazine, it is expected to generate $500 billion in profit (not just revenues) through other streams. For more details on this consequence see, Robert N. McChesney, “The Political Economy of Global Communication”, in Capitalism and the Information Age, Monthly Review Press, 1998.
[iii] Karl Marx, A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, Moscow, 1970, p. 197
[iv] For a descriptive survey of computing and information technology, refer www.brittanica.com
[v] Jayati Ghosh, People’s Democracy, November 5, 2000.
[vi] Hindustan Times, November 19, 2000 (New Delhi edition)
[vii] NASSCOM at www.nasscom.org
[viii] Dataquest, New Delhi, Vol XVIII, No. 13, July 15, 2000.
[ix] The Economic Times, July 4, 2000
[x] The Economic Times, July 21, 2000
[xi] GOI, Ministry of Information Technology, Annual Report 2000, New Delhi.
[xii] Bill Gates, The Road Ahead, p. 183.
[xiii] The Probe Team, Public Report on Basic Education in India, New Delhi, Oxford University Press, 1999.