|
|
|
|
28 June
2006
Press StatementThe
Polit Bureau of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) has issued the following
statement: The
CPI(M) has serious reservations and
apprehensions on the basis of the
media reports on the US and India
Nuclear Cooperation Promotion Act of 2006
draft Bill presented before the US House International Relations Committee. A more substantive response will be issued
when the full details are known. Firstly,
the Bill says that the presidential
waver will “cease to be affective” if India
conducts a nuclear test.
India’s unilateral moratorium on
conducting nuclear tests cannot be subservient
to such US conditionalities. India’s sovereignty on these matters cannot be compromised.
Secondly,
the Bill makes a specific reference to securing India’s, “full and
active participation” in the US efforts to “dissuade, isolate and if necessary
sanction and contain Iran” for seeking nuclear weapons.
This clearly substantiates
the CPI(M)’s apprehensions that through this nuclear deal, USA will arm twist
India to change its foreign policy
to kow tow to US strategic global
designs. Thirdly,
the Bill seeks to enforce India to
comply with the Fissile Material
Cut-off Treaty (FMCT) which India had in the past
refused to sign on the
grounds of it being discriminatory. Fourthly,
the Bill states that the US president must first determine
that India and the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) have “concluded a safeguards
agreement requiring the application
of IAEA safeguards in perpetuity.” This
runs completely contrary to the assurance given by the Prime Minister in both
the Houses of Parliament that India will
approach the IAEA for safeguards only after
the USA endorses
the July 18, 2005 nuclear deal. The CPI(M) is of the firm opinion that the above apprehensions completely contradict the assurances given by the UPA government to the Parliament and the country that India will not become prey to USA’s “carrot and stick policy”. The
CPI(M) calls upon the UPA government to
uphold India’s sovereignty in all these matters and not deviate from its stated foreign policy commitments and
positions under US pressure. |
|
|