March
15,
2004
Press
Release
Today,
we
are
coming
out
with
the
sixth
episode
of
our
series,
"Lies,
damned
lies
and
statistics",
on
the
oil
and
gas
sector
in
our
effort
to
nail
down
the
inaccuracies
and
falsehood
in
the
`Shining
India'
campaign.
We
intend
to
point
out
that
at
the
outset,
in
the
wake
of
our
independence,
this
is
one
sector
which
was
exclusively
dominated
by
private
companies
--
and
that
too
foreign
players.
Inspite
of
repeated
appeals,
these
companies
abandoned
this
sector
in
the
country
on
the
plea
that
it
was
unremunerative
and
that
there
was
not
a
single
drop
of
oil
to
be
found
in
India.
But,
events
proved
otherwise.
This
sector
was
nationalised
precisely
to
protect
our
national
assets
and
utilise
them
for
our
country's
interests
rather
than
profits
for
foreign
capital.
We,
therefore,
created
exploration,
refining,
marketing
and
pipeline
companies
in
oil
and
gas
sector
which
are
not
only
hugely
profitable
and
contribute
handsomely
to
the
public
exchequer
through
tax
and
dividends
and
have
returned
many-fold
the
public
investment
made
in
them
but
have
grown
to
global
level
companies
and
entities
like
ONGC
and
IOC
are
majors
in
the
sector
appearing
in
the
`Fortune
500'
list.
In
the
last
five
years,
the
retail
price
for
oil
and
gas
have
gone
up
which
has
cascading
effect
on
the
input
price
for
other
consumer
infrastructure,
agriculture
and
other
such
crucial
sectors
of
the
economy.
It
is
disturbing,
the
manner
in
which
shares
are
being
sold
in
ONGC
and
GAIL
which
surely
undervalues
the
prices
and
leads
to
a
huge
national
loss.
This
loss
estimated
to
Rs.
5,000
to
6,000
crores
on
a
conservative
estimate
of
comparison
between
price
earning
per
share
as
compared
to
similar
international
companies.
We
will,
or
course,
come
back
on
this
subject
shortly.
Is
India
Really
Shining?
Lies,
Damned
Lies
and
Statistics
Infrastructure:
Oil
v On February 21, 2004, the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas ran an advertisement, which contained some curious claims like a commitment towards no further increase in domestic LPG and kerosene prices, 90 exploration blocks awarded through global tender under NELP against 22 blocks in the previous 10 years in order to ensure self reliance and new oil and gas field discoveries. The advertisement further claimed credit for the disinvestment of government stakes in GAIL and ONGC.
v The price of fuel, especially kerosene which caters to the needs of a large section of the poor, has increased manifolds under the Vajpayee regime.
|
Annual
Rate
of
Price
Rise
of
Kerosene
(in
%) |
|||
|
|
2000-01 |
2001-02 |
2002-03 |
|
CPI |
145.0 |
-2.7 |
21.3 |
|
WPI |
235.0 |
-8.8 |
18.8 |
|
Source:
Economic
Survey,
2002-03 |
|||
Estimates based on the Consumer Price Index suggest a 145% hike in kerosene prices over 2000-01, which fell marginally in the next year only to rise by 21.3% in 2002-03. The fact that the Petroleum Ministry is making a commitment not to hike prices any more through a newspaper advertisement shows the discomfort of the government regarding the discontent within the masses on account of this tremendous hike in fuel price. However, there would hardly be any takers for such nonsensical claims.
v
As
far
as
the
claims
of
new
oil
exploration
ventures
and
oilfield
discoveries
are
concerned,
the
results
speak
for
themselves.
While
the
import
of
crude
oil
has
almost
trebled
from
1995-96
to
2001-02,
domestic
production
has
declined
by
nearly
3
million
tonnes
during
the
same
period.
So
much
for
the
propagated
myth
of
new
oilfield
discoveries
and
self
reliance
in
energy
resources.
|
Production
and
Import
of
Crude
Oil |
|||||||
|
(in
million
tonnes) |
|||||||
|
|
1995-96 |
1996-97 |
1997-98 |
1998-99 |
1999-00 |
2000-01 |
2001-02 |
|
Domestic
Production |
35.2 |
32.9 |
33.9 |
32.7 |
31.8 |
32.4 |
32.0 |
|
Imports |
27.3 |
33.9 |
34.5 |
39.8 |
45.0 |
74.1 |
78.7 |
|
Source:
Economic
Survey,
2002-03 |
|||||||
v
The
most
appalling
feature
of
this
government
is
the
celebration
over
the
disinvestment
of
profit-making
PSUs.
Despite
the
Oil
PSUs
having
earned
a
huge
combined
profit
of
Rs.
23,251
crores
in
2002-03,
the
government
has
undertaken
aggressive
disinvestment
of
several
strategic
units.
These
privatisation
measures
can
neither
be
justified
from
the
‘efficiency’
point
of
view,
since
the
oil
giants
are
highly
profitable,
nor
argued
to
have
contributed
to
net
revenue
mobilization
since
the
government
stands
to
loose
much
more
in
terms
of
the
stream
of
profits
which
would
have
accrued
in
the
future
from
these
PSUs,
than
what
it
mopped
up
through
one
time
sale.
The
government,
however,
far
from
providing
justification
for
these
outrageous
privatisation
measures
has
been
celebrating
it
in
advertisements.