|
|
|
|
19 December 2005Press StatementThe
Polit Bureau of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) has issued the following
statement: WTO Hong Kong Declaration: Inequitable For India And The Developing Countries The
declaration adopted at the WTO ministerial conference in Hong Kong makes it clear that
the global trading system continues to be weighted in favour of the developed countries. The Doha round of
negotiations initiated in 2001 has been used by the rich countries to protect
their interests to the detriment of
the vast mass of humanity belonging
to the developing countries. The
claims made regarding the agreement
on agriculture, the Non Agricultural Market Access (NAMA) which pertains to
industrial tariffs, the services sector and on intellectual property rights
(TRIPS) do not stand the test of scrutiny.
The role of the government
of India in these negotiations have not produced an outcome which adequately
protect the interests of the farmers and the country.
In
the vital area of agriculture, which affects millions of Indian farmers, the
agreement hardly provides any
protection, or, gains. The
commitment by the advanced countries to ease out
export subsidies by the year 2013 is no achievement considering the fact
that export subsidies constitute a very small part of the total subsidies that
agriculture receives in the
European Union where their share is not more than 3.5 per cent.
India will not be gaining much as its exports are limited.
In
the coming days, more pressures and
trade distorting tactics can be expected which will adversely affect farmers and
Indian agriculture. Our
primary interest should have been to ensure the protection of small and marginal farmers. The
special products and special
safeguard mechanism proposed will not be sufficient in the light of the fact
that we have already agreed to further cuts in
agricultural tariffs. The
government of India has to explain how the agreement in Hong Kong will help
protect our farmers and agriculture. The
agreement on industrial tariffs under NAMA will entail substantial cuts in
industrial tariffs for India and the developing countries.
In the light of the insignificant reductions in domestic farm subsidies
by the advanced countries, the tariff reduction commitments agreed to by India
is unjustifiable. The
most retrograde part of the declaration is regarding services.
As per the new regime, FDI in various services sectors will have to be
negotiated as the text commits
India to consider “commitments on enhanced
levels of foreign equity
participation”. Progressive liberalisation under GATS will ensure that
regulation of foreign service providers will be restricted.
The issue of government procurement will also be discussed.
Already the government has offered opening up of various services,
including health, education, financial services and telecommunication. In the
coming negotiations, the objective will be to get all limitations removed with
regard to FDI caps etc and bring these commitments as part of international
treaty obligations. India
has helped the US and the EU in facilitating
this agreement on services. The
terms of negotiations agreed to cannot be justified by the gains made in areas
like grant of more H1B visas and
business process outsourcing (BPO) which are
of interest to a small section of the people.
The
TRIPS agreement has so far worked in favour of the developed countries
and India failed to bring up issues necessary for review and amendments. The amendment enabling export of life saving
drugs under compulsory licence to
countries without manufacturing capacity is cumbersome and will not have much
practical value. The prices of
patented drugs will continue to rise affecting the common people.
Overall,
the Hong Kong declaration further
reinforces the unequal trade regime and international economic order.
The government of India has
failed to stand up firmly for a more equitable agreement both for India and the
developing countries. |
|
|