|
|
|
|
January 31, 2008 Press Statement The
Polit Bureau of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) has issued the following
statement: CPI (M) opposes Liberalization of FDI Norms The Union Cabinet has
decided to liberalize FDI norms in several crucial sectors. The decision to
raise the foreign equity cap from 26% to 49% in petroleum refining PSUs would
pave the way for further disinvestment in PSUs. A condition for compulsory
divestment of 26% stakes to an Indian partner in case of petroleum trading and
marketing companies has also been done away with. The CPI (M) is strongly
opposed to these policy moves, which seek to enhance the presence of foreign
companies in the strategic petroleum and natural gas sector.
The government should reconsider this decision. The decision to allow
FDI and FII upto 49% in commodity exchanges is also unwarranted. The Government
had earlier issued an Ordinance to amend the Forward Contracts Regulation Act
enabling the participation of foreign players in the commodity futures market,
defying the recommendation of a Parliamentary Standing Committee, which
categorically opposed such a provision. The Government seems to be impervious to
the opinion across the political spectrum that liberalization of commodity
exchanges is not in the interest of maintaining price stability in the economy. Allowing 100% FDI in
titanium mining is another retrograde move. Rather than strengthening the public
sector in the extraction of exhaustible minerals, the Government seems to be
keen on privatization and opening up of the mining sector. Further
liberalization of FDI norms in cargo airlines as well as ground-handling
operations also need to be reviewed from the security aspect. The National Common
Minimum Programme of the UPA Government says that FDI should be encouraged in
the areas of infrastructure, high technology and exports. The FDI policy review
undertaken by the Union Cabinet does not reflect such an approach. The Polit
Bureau is opposed to these moves and calls upon the UPA Government not to
proceed further with such decisions. |
|
|